NHL STICK CENSUS

The league, decoded.

StickDNA turns individual equipment records into league-level intelligence: flex, true curve families, actual kick points, graphics/build mismatches, legacy constructions that refuse to disappear, and the players who change sticks the most.

Current published sample: 7 players. Census results only include StickDNA records that have cleared the public research threshold. Percentages update automatically as coverage expands toward the top 100 and then the full NHL.
Published players7current public stick records
Build resolved86%6 of 7 current records
Graphics ≠ build57%4 confirmed mismatches
Legacy builds alive83%5 of 6 resolved current builds
FLEX CENSUS

How stiff is the NHL sample?

Current published flexes are grouped by the actual player specification we have documented. Unknown flexes stay outside the denominator.

96+ flex3 · 50%
≤75 flex1 · 17%
76–85 flex1 · 17%
86–95 flex1 · 17%
6 players with a published flex
CURVE CENSUS

Which curve families dominate?

True player molds are preserved separately, then grouped into a retail-style family only where the evidence supports a useful comparison.

P92 / Sakic family2 · 50%
Custom flat heel1 · 25%
Custom mid curve1 · 25%
4 players with a published curve or curve family
TRUE MOLDS / CODES

The patterns behind the family labels

Player-name molds and exact pro codes stay visible rather than being flattened into the nearest retail curve.

Connor Bedard · PP921 · 25%
Leon Draisaitl1 · 25%
P921 · 25%
Sidney Crosby1 · 25%
Exact mold/code only — family-only records are not forced into this list
ACTUAL KICK POINT

What the resolved builds really are

Distribution uses the underlying construction when StickDNA has established it, not the kick point implied by the visible graphic.

LOW3 · 50%
HIGH1 · 17%
HYBRID1 · 17%
MID1 · 17%
6 players with a published kick-point classification
VISIBLE BRAND SHARE

What you see on the ice

This is the brand presented by the current graphics. It is deliberately kept separate from the underlying construction data.

Bauer2 · 29%
CCM2 · 29%
PRO Reserve1 · 14%
Sherwood1 · 14%
Warrior1 · 14%
7 current published records
UNDERLYING BRAND SHARE

What the construction tells us

Only records with an established underlying build are counted here. Unknown remains outside the denominator rather than being guessed.

Bauer2 · 33%
CCM2 · 33%
Sherwood1 · 17%
Warrior1 · 17%
6 players with an underlying brand resolved
MOST COMMON CONSTRUCTIONS

The builds that keep showing up

Current underlying constructions across the published sample. Legacy builds dressed as newer sticks count as the construction they actually are.

Bauer Nexus 2N Pro XL1 · 17%
Bauer Supreme 2S Pro XL1 · 17%
CCM JetSpeed FT6 Pro1 · 17%
CCM Ribcor Reckoner1 · 17%
Sherwood Rekker Morph Pro1 · 17%
Warrior Covert QR5 Pro1 · 17%
6 current records with construction resolved
LEGACY BUILD INDEX

Old constructions that refuse to die.

A build appears here only when the StickDNA construction catalog marks it as legacy and a current published player is still documented on it. “Legacy” does not automatically mean we know the exact manufacturer discontinuation date.

Bauer Nexus 2N Pro XL1 · 20%
Bauer Supreme 2S Pro XL1 · 20%
CCM JetSpeed FT6 Pro1 · 20%
CCM Ribcor Reckoner1 · 20%
Warrior Covert QR5 Pro1 · 20%
BEHIND THE GRAPHICS

Biggest current graphics/build mismatches

Browse all players →
STICK NERD INDEX

Who changes sticks the most?

This ranks documented StickDNA history, not reputation. More research coverage produces a higher-confidence churn ranking, so treat the early table as a live intelligence leaderboard rather than a final league verdict.

Census rule: StickDNA counts only what the evidence supports. Flex, true curve, visible graphics, underlying construction and historical events remain separate fields; unknown values stay outside the relevant denominator instead of being inferred.